Michael Rand started RandBall with hopes that he could convince the world to love jumpsuits as much as he does. So far, he's only succeeded in using the word "redacted" a lot. He welcomes suggestions, news tips, links of pure genius, and pictures of pets in Halloween costumes here, though he already knows he will regret that last part.
Follow Randball on Twitter
His verified account is mostly inspirational quotes anyway, but this morning four different quotes have been posted on his feed: One from Willie Mays (Giants), one from Ernie Banks (Cubs), one from Joe DiMaggio (Yankees) and one from … Kirby Puckett (Twins, in case you were wondering).
Coincidentally (or not) all of those teams are said to have some level of interest in Santana.
Stay tuned … we’ll see if he takes his trolling to another level.
“I hope the Lakers lose every game,” Magic said, adding, “If you’re going to lose, lose.”
This mentality is borne out of some logic — twisted logic in some ways, but smart (on paper) logic in others. The more you lose, the better chance you have to get a good draft pick, of course. So if the choice is between winning 30 games and getting the No. 11 pick or winning 20 games and perhaps getting the No. 1 pick, why wouldn’t you just go all out and try to get that better player?
Listen: we have no problem with the notion of a youth movement and doing what the Wolves are doing right now (partly by choice, a little more so by necessity). Developing players is probably the best way for a team like Minnesota to ever become a true contender (though it should be noted that on the best Wolves team in franchise history, exactly one of the top nine players in terms of minutes played was a Wolves draft pick).
But the idea of it being good to lose? Never.
First, it has the ability to create bad habits with players and bad situations in locker rooms.
More than that, though, it’s a symptom of a greater ill: a sort of societal depression springing from growing recent phenomenon that if there is no means for instant gratification, what’s the point?
If a team (or fan) can’t get the instant satisfaction of having a playoff contender, the mentality quickly shifts to a distant, pie-in-the-sky fantasy that it’s all OK because losing now means winning later. It makes people think that losing is the key to winning — that losing IS the new winning. And that’s just so wrong.
Nobody wants to think about the in-between. Not enough people want to put in the work — or really understand that 40 wins is a lot closer to 60 wins than 20 wins.
Win big or lose big. That’s the mentality, and that’s what Magic is saying. It’s just so very sad.
We’re not sure quite what, but it’s something we clicked on last year out of some sort of morbid curiosity, and it’s something we clicked on again this year because, frankly, we thought we might get a cheap blog post out of it.
And we were right!
Craig Calcaterra at Hardball Talk, last offseason, ranked the MLB managers 1-30 in terms of handsomeness.
This is a strange thing to do. It’s a strange thing to click on. But we remember it well. In any event, poor Ron Gardenhire finished 28th out of 30 last year in Craig’s rankings. Gardy got teased about it a little bit, too.
Well, of course, the Twins swapped managers in the offseason. And now you’re dying to know how handsome Calcaterra thinks Paul Molitor is, right?
Well, even if you weren’t, we’re going to tell you: Molitor is 8th. That’s a big leap for the Twins into the top 10, a move of 20 spots, a massive upgrade in VORMH (Value Over Replacement Manager Handsomeness).
Here’s what was written about Molitor, as part of a delicate discussion about what the aging process has done to his looks: (Aaron) Gleeman observes that, in the right light, Molitor still looks like his old self, but he’s very, very dependent on the light. So, for now, consider his ranking provisional. We’ll see how he does under the spotlight for the next year. Wait, no spotlight. Maybe some shadows would be helpful here.
So there you have it. We will, from this point forward, be referring to this as the Haute Stove, by the way.
In days of yore — maybe last year? — the NFL would have reaped the benefit of releasing a “tough” new personal conduct policy in the form of positive stories throughout a news cycle.
But now? Even as the NFL trots out the new policy, they are getting hammered from two fronts.
First, a new ESPN story that digs deeper into the inconsistencies in Roger Goodell’s handling of the Ray Rice story. That story undermines — in a good, well-reported way — a lot of whatever the NFL was trying to achieve today.
Second, the NFLPA, which has been at odds with owners and the commish during much of this season, released a statement blasting the league for not consulting with the players before releasing the new policy.
As a result, the NFL doesn’t get to own this positive story, even for a day. They probably don’t deserve to, and it’s nice to see the league constantly challenged the way it is now.
First off, sorry for the cliche in the headline. “Measuring stick” is an awful term, but it’s short and sweet. When we use it, you know what we mean: this upcoming game for the Vikings against the Lions is an opportunity for the team and QB Teddy Bridgewater to chart their progression.
Why this game as opposed to others? Well, yes, in a sense this season every game is a “measuring stick” game for a team trying to carve out a new identity, with a new head coach, with a rookie quarterback and without the player around whom the offense was supposed to be built around.
But this one in particular stands out for a few reasons:
1) The first time the Vikings played the Lions, it represented the low-water mark for the offense in a season that hasn’t exactly been crammed full of offensive highlights. Minnesota lost 17-3. Bridgewater was sacked eight times. He threw three interceptions, including a very bad throw early in the game in the red zone.
Now, some of this has to do with the Lions. The Vikings aren’t the only team this season to struggle with moving the ball and scoring against Detroit. The Lions’ front four is formidable, and the entire defense has allowed the second-fewest yards and fifth-lowest passer rating in the NFL this season.
The Vikings have shown marked progress on offense in recent weeks. Some inconsistency has still crept in, but overall this offense is functioning at a higher level than it was last time against Detroit. But it has also been feasting on some defenses much worse than the one the Lions will present. Hence, measuring stick game.
2) This is the first game in which Bridgewater will be facing an opponent for the second time. (The Vikings have also played Green Bay twice this season, but Christian Ponder started the first one). That means we’ll get a look at how Bridgewater adapts to a team he has already seen — and how he adapts to that team adapting to him.
Playing QB at a high level is as much mental (if not more) as it is physical. No, we’ve never — as pal John Sharkman would say — played the game. But everything we’ve heard, read and seen would suggest that is true.
Bridgewater’s physical gifts have been debated, but his mental game is usually praised. The Lions will challenge him physically, but mentally he already has a frame of reference for what he is going to see. How that translates into his performance against a strong defense will be interesting, and important, to watch.
3) The Vikings haven’t beaten a good team this season. They are 6-7, and their wins are all against sub-.500 teams: Rams, Falcons, Bucs, Washington, Panthers, Jets. There’s no crime in winning the games you’re supposed to win, but coach Mike Zimmer acknowledged Wednesday that a win over a team like Detroit would be more of an indication that the Vikings are getting closer to being the team he envisions instead of just a work in progress.
|Philadelphia||12/20/14 3:30 PM|
|San Diego||12/20/14 7:25 PM|
|Minnesota||12/21/14 12:00 PM|
|Baltimore||12/21/14 12:00 PM|
|Detroit||12/21/14 12:00 PM|
|Cleveland||12/21/14 12:00 PM|
|Atlanta||12/21/14 12:00 PM|
|Green Bay||12/21/14 12:00 PM|
|Kansas City||12/21/14 12:00 PM|
|New England||12/21/14 12:00 PM|
|NY Giants||12/21/14 3:05 PM|
|Buffalo||12/21/14 3:25 PM|
|Indianapolis||12/21/14 3:25 PM|
|Seattle||12/21/14 7:30 PM|
|Denver||12/22/14 7:30 PM|
|New York||7:00 PM|
|New Orleans||7:30 PM|
|Oklahoma City||9:30 PM|
|St. Louis||9:30 PM|
|St Thomas (TX)||11:30 AM|
|Stony Brook||6:00 PM|
|South Alabama||6:00 PM|
|Seton Hall||6:00 PM|
|Ga Southern||6:00 PM|
|Cleveland State||6:00 PM|
|Wright State||6:00 PM|
|Morgan State||6:30 PM|
|Idaho State||6:30 PM|
|South Dakota St|
|Oakland City||7:00 PM|
|Appalachian St||7:00 PM|
|Southern Miss||7:00 PM|
|Coastal Carolina||7:00 PM|
|Montana State||7:30 PM|
|Cal State Fullerton|
|Walla Walla||9:00 PM|
|Portland State||9:00 PM|
|Nevada||12/20/14 10:00 AM|
|Utah State||12/20/14 1:20 PM|
|(23) Utah||12/20/14 2:30 PM|
|Western Mich||12/20/14 4:45 PM|
|South Alabama||12/20/14 8:15 PM|
|BYU||12/22/14 1:00 PM|
|Marshall||12/23/14 5:00 PM|
|Navy||12/23/14 8:30 PM|
|San Diego St|
|Central Mich||12/24/14 11:00 AM|
|Fresno State||12/24/14 7:00 PM|
|High Point||10:00 AM|
|Chicago State||11:00 AM|
|Northwestern Coll||11:05 AM|
|Southern Miss||4:00 PM|
|St Mary-KS||5:00 PM|
|William & Mary||5:00 PM|
|Loyola Marymount||6:00 PM|
|St Francis-PA||6:00 PM|
|Delaware State||6:00 PM|
|Tenn Temple||6:00 PM|
|West Virginia St||6:00 PM|
|Ball State||6:00 PM|
|Tenn Tech||6:30 PM|
|New Orleans||7:00 PM|
|Incarnate Word||7:00 PM|
|Ark-Little Rock||7:00 PM|
|South Dakota St|
|Santa Clara||8:00 PM|
|(19) Oklahoma St||8:00 PM|
|San Diego State|
|Cal Poly||8:00 PM|
|(10) Louisville||8:00 PM|